Werres v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COLEMAN, J.
Alem Werres was convicted in a bench trial of distributing cocaine and possessing an imitation controlled substance with the intent to distribute. He appeals the conviction for possessing an imitation controlled substance. Werres contends that: (1) the trial court erred in ruling, that the 1992 amendment to Code § 18.2-247(B) changed the elements of the offense so as no longer to require proof that the imitation substance is a substance that is subject to abuse as set forth in Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 473, 475, 404 S.E.2d 522, 523 (1991), and (2) the evidence is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
- Branch v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Wilkins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1994
- Graybeal v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Adkins v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Broadnax v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1999
- Derrick Renard Powell v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2013
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
- Cooper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.