Sheridan v. . Andrews
New York Court of Appeals
Plaintiff sued to recover moneys in the hands of defendant Cameron as receiver. He made several others parties defendants. He asked judgment in the alternative; one clause of bis prayer was that the receiver be required to pay the money to him. The defendants appeared and answered separately. It appeared from the pleadings that the defendants other than Cameron claimed interest in the moneys in hostility to the claim of the plaintiff.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff sued to recover moneys in the hands of defendant Cameron as receiver. He made several others parties defendants. He asked judgment in the alternative; one clause of bis prayer was that the receiver be required to pay the money to him. The defendants appeared and answered separately. It appeared from the pleadings that the defendants other than Cameron claimed interest in the moneys in hostility to the claim of the plaintiff. A trial was had at Special Term, and a judgment was rendered dismissing- the plaintiff’s complaint and adjudging costs to the several defendants in different…
1Per curiam
opinion for reversal of order as to appellant, without costs.. All concur, except Miller, J., not voting, and Andrews, J., absent.
Order reversed.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Corn Exchange Bank of Chicago v. BlyeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Banow v. SiminsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Hone v. . De PeysterNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Brown v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890
- Blumenstock v. Weissman, New York County Courts1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.