Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Brantley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1998No. COA97-688Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Judge Walker

concurring in part and dissenting in part.

I concur with the majority’s opinion that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and understandingly waived her rights under Miranda and N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-595(a).

*732However, I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offense of misdemeanor possession of stolen goods.

A trial court is not required to instruct on lesser-included offenses of a crime “when the State’s evidence is positive as to each and every element of the crime charged and there is no…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. McKinnonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API