Legal Opinion
City & County of SF v. Ind. Acc. Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 1956No. Civ. No. 16965PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
142 Cal.App.2d 494 (1956)
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Petitioner,
v.
INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION and HELEN BAMFORD, Respondents.
Civ. No. 16965.
California Court of Appeals. First Dist., Div. One.
June 25, 1956.
Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and Patrick R. Kelly, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioner.
Everett A. Corten and Daniel C. Murphy for Respondents.
WOOD (Fred B.), J.
The main question upon this review of a decision of the Industrial Accident Commission which awarded benefits to the widow of a member of petitioner's fire department, involves the applicability of the disputable presumption…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- French v. RishellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Healy v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- California Highway Patrol v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Garrick v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971