Legal Opinion

State v. McDonald

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 7, 1935No. 32780PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Justice.

A. J. McDonald, the relator, was convicted of selling intoxicating liquor within five miles of the Logansport High School. The offense is denounced by Act No. 73 of 1896.

The only question presented for decision is whether Act No. 73 of 1896 was repealed by Act No. 39 of 1921, Ex. Sess., generally known as the “Hood Act,” which was itself repealed by Act No. 1 of 1933, Ex. Sess.

In the tenth section of Act No. 39 of 1921, Ex. Sess., after providing that the statute in no way repeals the “Blind Tiger Act” (Act No. 8 of 1915, Ex. Sess.) and the “Near Beer Act” (Act No.* 14 of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. CarterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mouledoux v. MaestriSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
  2. City of Bogalusa v. GullottaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  3. State v. BonnerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  4. McManemin v. Bossier Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API