Rodriguez v. Sabatino
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
The district court denied the plaintiffs’ motion to remand because it determined that they had fraudulently joined two defendants. Hence, it had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Subsequently, the district court granted the defendants’ summary judgment motion, dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint. On appeal, the plaintiffs contend that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over their case. We affirm.
I
On December 12,1992, Maria Reyes (“Maria”), Jorge Rodriguez (“Jorge”), and Francisco Sanchez went to a quincinera hosted by Maria and Mario Mora at the Magnolia…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- El Chico Corp. v. PooleTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Otis Engineering Corp. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Burden v. General Dynamics Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- David R. Green v. Amerada Hess Corporation and L.A. StricklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Boudreaux v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Vantage Drilling Company v. Hsin-Chi SuCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- Addo v. Globe Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Cobb v. Delta Exports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- African Methodist Episcopal v. Willard Lucien, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.