Legal Opinion
In re Conner
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico
Decided October 4, 2016No. 11-11696 ta13PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Hon. David T. Thuma, United States Bankruptcy Judge
Before the Court is a supplemental fee application, filed by debtors’ counsel after the Debtors made their final plan payment. The chapter 13 trustee objected to the application based on, inter alia, laches. The Court concludes that the fees should be allowed under § 3301 and as a § 503(b)(2) administrative expense, but that the i timing of the application may affect collectability of the fees.
L FACTS 2
Debtors filed their bankruptcy petition on April 15,2011, and confirmed a Chapter 13 plan in September 15, 2011. The plan provides:
3.1…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- LeBlanc v. SalemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Lawrence Tractor Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Meza v. Truman (In Re Meza)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Market Center East Retail Property, Inc. v. LurieCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cripps v. Foley (In re Cripps)District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2017
- In re LongUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2016
- Angelito Uy Sepulvida and Maria Bituin CaranayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2023
- Angelito Uy Sepulvida and Maria Bituin CaranayUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
- Elizabeth A. GriegoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.