Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Lobe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1904No. 4815PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered May 5, 1903, quashing an award made by a board of arbitration.

1Opinion of the Court

Mount, J. —

In January, 1902, the appellants and respondent entered into the following contract of arbitration:

“Memorandum of Agreement, made and entered into this - day of January, A. D. 1902, by and between J. Eugene Jordan, Histogenetic Medicine Co. and Sea Level Mining & Milling Co., first parties and E. Lobe, second party. Witnesseth : That, whereas, disputes have arisen between first parties and second party which said parties desire to settle without any great litigation and by arbitration: It is therefore agreed:
“Eirst. That said matters so in dispute shall be submitted to a board of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ryan v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Bent v. Erie Telegraph & Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  3. Conrad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Burnam v. BurnamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API