Legal Opinion
Jordan v. Lobe
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1904No. 4815PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered May 5, 1903, quashing an award made by a board of arbitration.
1Opinion of the Court
Mount, J. —
In January, 1902, the appellants and respondent entered into the following contract of arbitration:
“Memorandum of Agreement, made and entered into this - day of January, A. D. 1902, by and between J. Eugene Jordan, Histogenetic Medicine Co. and Sea Level Mining & Milling Co., first parties and E. Lobe, second party. Witnesseth : That, whereas, disputes have arisen between first parties and second party which said parties desire to settle without any great litigation and by arbitration: It is therefore agreed:
“Eirst. That said matters so in dispute shall be submitted to a board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ryan v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Bent v. Erie Telegraph & Telephone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Conrad v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Burnam v. BurnamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dickie Manufacturing Co. v. Sound Construction & Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Hegeberg v. New England Fish Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941