Legal Opinion
United States v. Royer
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 1986No. Civ. A. 82-1071PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CALDWELL, District Judge.
I. Introduction and Background
The parties have cross-moved for summary judgment. 1 The issue presented is whether the federal government obligated itself under the terms of a mortgage to comply with state law before foreclosing on a federally financed mortgage.
On August 31, 1982, plaintiff, United States of America, filed a complaint in mortgage foreclosure on a mortgage issued to the defendants, Robert C. Royer and Linda L. Royer, by the Fanners Home Administration (FmHA). The defendants did not appear or plead and a default judgment was entered against…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States of America, Huron Towers, Inc. v. Morton L. Scholnick and Seymour Dunitz, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
- United States v. JohanssonDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant in No. 87-1777 v. Marcus Spears and Doris E. Spears. Appeal of Doris Spears, in No. 87-1735Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States of America, Cross-Appellant in No. 87-1777 v. Marcus Spears and Doris E. Spears. Appeal of Doris Spears, in No. 87-1735Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988