Legal Opinion
In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney General
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 24, 1991No. 90-2544PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.
Contestee, Lee I. Fisher, has filed a motion with accompanying memorandum to require con-testor, Paul E. Pfeifer, to produce certain notes made by witnesses David Payne and Michael Slanker as observers during the official recount of ballots for the Office of Attorney General held on December 11, 1990 in Mahoning County and at a subsequent examination of materials and equipment also held in Mahoning County on January 9, 1991. Contestor deposed Payne and Slanker on January 16, 1991 and filed their depositions with the court on January 17, 1991. Con-testor has filed a memorandum in opposition,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Handgards, Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1976
- Lott v. Seaboard Systems RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1985
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kremer v. CoxOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Burnham v. Cleveland Clinic (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Election of November 6, 1990 for the Office of Attorney GeneralOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Frank W. Schaefer, Inc. v. C. Garfield Mitchell Agency, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Moss v. BushOhio Supreme Court · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.