State ex rel. Hughlett v. Finley
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. Respondent’s motion for judgment, notwithstanding appellant’s return, to the alternative writ of mandamus, issued by the court against him admits the allegations in said return set forth.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Montgomery Circuit Court. — Hon. E. M. Hughes, Judge. Respondent’s motion for judgment, notwithstanding appellant’s return, to the alternative writ of mandamus, issued by the court against him admits the allegations in said return set forth. State ex rel. v. Neville, 110 Mo. 345. And the cause will be heard in this court, upon the record proper, notwithstanding the fact that there was no motion for new trial or in arrest of judgment filed in the trial court and reverse judgment if erroneous. Mclntire v. Mclntire, 80 Mo. 470; Childs v. R’y, 117 Mo. 427; Bevin v. Powell, 11 Mo.…
1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.
— The respondent Thomas Hughlett begun this action in the circuit court, by petition for mandamus against T. A. Finley et al., as the board of aldermen of the city of Wellsville, praying that they be compelled to issue to him a certificate of election as marshal of said city, and to receive and approve his bond as such marshal, and to issue him a salary warrant. On trial a peremptory writ was awarded against appellants, requiring them, as the board of aldermen of the city of Wellsville, to issue a certificate of election to Thomas Hughlett as marshal of said city. .From this judgment of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State ex rel. Wear v. FrancisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- School District No. 11 v. LauderbaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. Kansas City, St. Joseph & Council Bluffs RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
- State ex rel. Millett v. FieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- State ex rel. State Savings Building & Loan Ass'n, No. 1 v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Priddy v. GibsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State ex rel. Goodnow v. Police CommissionersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899
- State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. WenomSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State ex rel. Missouri Glass Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912