Legal Opinion

United States v. Baldy

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1939No. 9241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEALY, Circuit Judge.

Appellee had judgment in a suit to obtain a refund of a tax exacted under § 213 of the National Industrial Recovery Act (48 Stat. 206), and the Government appeals.1 The statute, § 213(a), imposed an excise tax of 5% upon the receipt of corporate dividends, the tax to be withheld at the source. Dividends declared before the date of the enactment of the statute (June 16, 1933), although paid after that date, were exempted from the tax.

The findings are that on April 15, 1933 appellee’s board of directors adopted a resolution reading as follows: “Mr. Gibbs then moved and Mr.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Southwestern Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  2. Maloney v. Western Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API