Legal Opinion

State v. Dayutis

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 1985No. 83-510PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

The defendant, Dean Dayutis, appeals his conviction of second degree murder and his sentencing by the Superior Court {Nadeau, J.). He raises five issues: first, that he is entitled to a mistrial because the prosecutor in his opening statement referred to evidence previously precluded by a court order; second, that the indictment should have been dismissed because the State did not present certain exculpatory evidence to the grand jury; third, that the trial court had no statutory basis for sentencing him to life imprisonment with a minimum term of not less than thirty-five (35) years; fourth,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. Rodriguez/BuckOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. CobbSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. State v. GiordanoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. Peters v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. State v. JaromaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API