Legal Opinion

Mular v. Fredericks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 27, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In a consolidated action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), entered August 27, 2002, which, after a jury trial on the issue of liability, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against them.

Ordered that the interlocutory judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“[W]here an action has long been certified as ready for trial and the moving party had full knowledge of the new cause of action, in the absence of good cause for the failure to move to amend at an earlier date, the motion should be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tarlowe v. Metropolitan Ski Slopes, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Felix v. LettreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Smith v. Hercules Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Messina v. Staten Island University HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Chiu v. ChiuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Kimso Apartments, LLC v. GandhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Kimso Apartments, LLC v. GandhiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API