Legal Opinion
Castillo v. Spiliada Maritime Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided June 25, 1990No. Civ. A. No. 89-3769PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are five Filipino seamen who were discharged from Defendant Spiliada Maritime Corporation’s (“Spiliada”) vessel, M/V SPILIADA, in New Orleans on July 7, 1989. Plaintiffs assert wage and penalty wage claims pursuant to U.S. Penalty Wage Statute, 46 U.S.C. 10313.1 Spiliada filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, or Alternatively, Motion to Stay Proceedings, contending that plaintiffs entered a binding and final settlement prior to the date this suit was filed. Plaintiffs asserted their own Motion for Summary Judgment, contending that the settlement they entered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Garrett v. Moore-McCormack Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Garrett v. Moore-Mccormack Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ronnie Gene Bass v. Phoenix Seadrill/78, Ltd., Third-Party v. Crown Rig Building Services, Inc., and Branham Industries, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Durden v. Exxon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mateo v. M/S KISODistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Rey Castillo, Carlos Abesamis, Lauro Malinas, Emetrio Noble, and Jerry Ramos v. Spiliada Maritime Corporation and Spiliada MvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Rey Castillo, Carlos Abesamis, Lauro Malinas, Emetrio Noble, and Jerry Ramos v. Spiliada Maritime Corporation and Spiliada MvCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991