Hanson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of possessing liquor; from city court of LaGrange — Judge Duke Davis. May 21, 1921.
1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.
Only the first headnote needs elaboration. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial is as follows: "Because at the beginning of the criminal week of the March term of the city court of LaGrange movant was advised by his then sole counsel, Judson Andrews, that on account of his physical condition a, leave of. absence had [been ?] granted him, and that the case against movant would not be tried at that term of court, and that it would [not P] be necessary to have any witnesses attend court until the-June term of said court. Movant had no knowledge, notice, or information…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
- Phillips & Son v. Bagwell Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baxter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
- Territory of Hawaii v. LewisHawaii Supreme Court · 1953