Ford Motor Co. v. Dillon
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By ROSS, PJ.
Nowhere in the petition is it alleged that the injury was received by the plaintiff during and as a result of his employment. The allegations of fact in the petition are sufficiently definite to permit such a conclusion. The evidence indicates that such was the casé,> and the petition could be amended to conform to the proof.
The record shows that the plaintiff while employed, as alleged, suffered the injuries stated. No immediate disability 'occurred. About six months later, the plaintiff became paralyzed upon one side. The plaintiff claims that the paralysis was due to his…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- MACDONALD v. STATE Ex FULTONOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pettett v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
- Kossuth v. BearOhio Court of Appeals · 1953
- Allison v. Daniels, Unpublished Decision (9-20-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State ex rel. Morris v. Industrial CommOhio Court of Appeals · 1938