Wells v. Bullock

Bullock instituted an action to recover from Wells the alleged balance due on the purchase money of a used motor truck. When Bullock sold and delivered the trucks to Wells, he represented to Wells that he had an unencumbered title thereto, and he sold it unconditionally. The transaction was distinctly evidenced by a written bill of sale; there was no retention of title to' secure the deferred monthly payments, nor was there any provision whatever for an acceleration of the deferred payments.

Bullock had bought the truck from Cockroft who had reserved title for the security of the balance of…