Legal Opinion

Lytle v. Potter

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided October 6, 2006No. 3:05CV7254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARR, Chief Judge.

This is a suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by plaintiffs Ronald Lytle and Ricky Lee Ly-tle in which the plaintiffs allege an unconstitutional taking of their real and personal property, state claims for trespass and conversion, and claims environmental damage against the Kenton-Hardin County, Ohio, Board of Health [Board], the Hardin County Board of Commissioners, the Prosecuting Attorney for Hardin County, the Hardin County Engineer, the Sheriff and Deputy Sheriff of Hardin County, and certain Trustees of Washington Township, all of them being sued in their official and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Charles W. Warren Ruth Warren v. City of Athens, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. River City Capital, L.P. v. Board of County Commissioners, Clermont County, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. River City Capital v. Bd of County CommCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API