Legal Opinion
Pitchford Ex Rel. M. v. Salem-Keizer School District No. 24J
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 20, 2001No. Civil 00-629-JOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.
Leslie Pitchford and Andrew Stich (“plaintiffs”) bring this action on behalf of their autistic child, M. Plaintiffs claim that defendant, the Salem Keizer School District (“defendant” or the “district”), failed to provide M. with a free and appropriate public education (“FAPE”) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1401(a)(18), and corresponding state law. On January 7, 2000, after fourteen (14) days of hearings, Administrative Law Judge Thomas B. Herbert (the “ALJ”) issued findings of fact and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eddie W. ABBOTT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis M. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gregory K., a Student of the Longview School District v. Longview School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- W.G. B.G., Individually and as Parents of R.G., a Minor v. Board of Trustees of Target Range School District No. 23, Missoula, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- B. L. Ex Rel. T.L. v. New Britain Board of EducationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Joshua A. ex rel. Jorge A. v. Rocklin Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009