Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 2005No. 3916Published

1Opinion of the Court

363 S.C. 111 (2005)

609 S.E.2d 528

The STATE, Respondent,

v.

Thurman O'Neil SMITH, Jr., Appellant.

No. 3916.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard November 10, 2004.

Decided January 10, 2005.

Withdrawn, Substituted and Refiled February 10, 2005.

Edward T. Hinson, Jr., of Charlotte, NC, and Leland Bland Greeley, of Rock Hill, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry D. McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant and Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of York, for Respondent.

STILWELL,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. KnotenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. State v. CrosbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. CooleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  5. State v. PaulingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API