Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Berryhill

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided October 28, 2021No. 2:18-cv-12008Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION THERESA A. ANDERSON, CASE NO. 18-CV-12008 Plaintiff, v. HON. NANCY G. EDMUNDS DISTRICT JUDGE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, HON. PATRICIA T. MORRIS MAGISTRATE JUDGE Defendant. _______________________________/ REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES (ECF No. 29) RECOMMENDATION For the reasons set forth below, IT IS RECOMMENDED that Petitioner’s motion for an award of attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (ECF No. 29) be DENIED. REPORT I. Introduction and Background In this matter, Theresa…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  3. Gisbrecht v. BarnhartSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Eloise HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Willis v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API