Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cbs, Inc., Plaintiff/counterdefendant Appellee/cross-Appellant v. David Merrick, Defendant/counterclaimant Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 27, 1983No. CA 82-5520, 82-5557Published

1ConcurrenceNelson, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion but believe that the applicable law in section II requires further clarification.

The proper measure of damages in this case depends on an interpretation of an unclear area of New York law. Although CBS denominated its complaint below as one for rescission, I believe CBS’s lawsuit was effectively a breach of contract action. The complaint sought restitution instead of lost profits because of the speculative nature of the breached contract. The question presented to us, then, is whether an award of restitution when used as a substitute for speculative lost…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kountze v. . KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Sheridan Drive-In, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  5. Clark v. KirbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API