Legal Opinion

Liggins v. Colvin

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 20, 2015No. 14-1339PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Tillman Liggins sought disability benefits based on chronic back pain, morbid obesity, and bilateral hand pain with numbness and tingling, but an administrative law judge found that despite these conditions Liggins retained the residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform sedentary work. Liggins now challenges the ALJ’s findings; he focuses particularly on the RFC the ALJ used, the ALJ’s negative credibility assessment, and the weight the ALJ gave to the opinion of Liggins’s treating physician. Because substantial evidence does not support the ALJ’s decision, we vacate and remand.

I

At…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Villano v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Linda Roddy v. Michael AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Scott v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  5. Christine Bjornson v. Michael AstruCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
  2. Brown v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  3. Byrd v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
  4. Davis v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Deuter v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API