Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Sullivan v. Erle

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1896Published

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Concurrence

Bissell, J.,

specially concurring.

I asseut to the affirmance of this judgment. My concurrence does not extend to an indorsement of the reasoning of the principal opinion, nor to the statement of the rule which prevails both in England and in this country respecting the distribution of the assets either of insolvent assignors or of decedents who have died insolvent, and whose estates have passed into the hands of their representatives. I should be contented with a simple suggestion that the case was controlled by a decision of the supreme court decided at its January term (Erle v. Lane, 22…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. People v. E. Remington & SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Harrington v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Furness v. Union National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Findlay v. HosmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1817

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API