Legal Opinion

Coppola v. McNab

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 29, 1989No. 87-2906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse. Donald Coppola’s counsel failed to meet with opposing counsel to draw a pre-trial statement as ordered by the trial court. As a result, the trial court sanctioned Coppola by striking his pleadings and entering a default against him. In our view, the sanction imposed, in light of the facts of this case, was too harsh a penalty for a first infraction. See Beasley v. Girten, 61 So.2d 179 (Fla.1952).

Within one day of learning he had been sanctioned, Coppola hired a new lawyer and immediately filed a sworn motion for reconsideration which was uncontroverted by the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beasley v. GirtenSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Florida Lime Growers, Inc. v. Bloomer Plastics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. Cushman & Wakefíeld of Florida, Inc. v. HughesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API