Legal Opinion · Dissent

King v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1989No. 1806Published

1DissentCavanaugh, Judge

I dissent on the basis of our en banc opinion per curiam in Ceresini v. Valley View Trailer Park, Ephrata, Inc., 380 Pa.Super. 416, 552 A.2d 258 (1988) which held that new Rule 238 “applies to all actions pending at the trial level, or on appeal, in which the issue of delay damages has been preserved and not finally determined, as in this case.”

The majority opinion now holds that where the defendant against whom delay damages have been awarded has appealed, and the plaintiff having received delay damages does not appeal, then Ceresini should not be followed and there should be no remand for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Craig v. Magee Memorial Rehabilitation CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Sonder v. SonderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ceresini v. Valley View Trailer ParkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Miller v. Wise Business Forms, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Arcidiacono v. Timeless Towns of the Americas, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API