Legal Opinion

Maxwood Music Ltd. v. Malakian

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 1, 2010No. 08 Civ. 1730PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Daron Malakian (“Malakian”), d/b/a Malakian Publishing, and Serj Tankian (“Tankian”), d/b/a Shattered Mirrors Publishing (together, the “Defendants”), have moved for attorneys’ fees and costs, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 505, following the May 18, 2010 dismissal of all claims of Plaintiff Maxwood Music Limited (“Maxwood” or the “Plaintiff’). For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ motion is denied for attorneys’ fees and granted for costs.

Prior Proceedings

This action was commenced by Max-wood on February 21, 2008. The trial and submission of evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Maxwood Music Ltd. v. MalakianDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re: Julia BowensUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
  2. Richard A Hazelton and Kelly J HazeltonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API