Legal Opinion

Reese v. Schenck, as Recvr.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 2, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, C. J.

In this case Schenck, as receiver, sued Mrs. Reese on certain promissory notes.

The second amended second plea of the defendant, in which it is attempted to plead “no consideration” and the allegations of which must be construed most strongly against the pleader, shows that Mrs. Reese while under coverture executed a note with her husband. The plea further shows that after Mrs. Reese was divorced the bank threatened suit. Mrs. Reese, to avoid the threatened suit and because of alleged misrepresentations by the Bank as to her legal liability, made and executed her individual notes to the bank…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parr v. Fort Pierce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tharp v. Kitchell Tharp v. HiscockSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Boulevard National Bank of Miami v. Gulf American Land Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1966
  3. Emerson v. MansfieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API