State Ex Rel. Three Unnamed v. Peterson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
¶ 1. Attorney Francis Schmitz, who has been designated as the special prosecutor representing the State of Wisconsin throughout the proceedings in this court, has filed a motion for reconsideration of a portion of this court's July 16, 2015 decision. Attorney Schmitz also asks this court to stay its mandate regarding the documents and data gathered during the investigation while the prosecution team determines whether to seek federal review of our decision. In response, some of the Unnamed Movants (as that term was defined in the July 16, 2015 majority opinion) challenge whether Attorney…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Bostco LLC v. Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage DistrictWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- State Ex Rel. Two Unnamed v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. GudenschwagerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Tatera v. FMC Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
3Cited by19 opinions
- Cynthia Archer v. John ChisholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- John K. Maciver Inst. for Pub. Policy, Inc. v. SchmitzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- State Ex Rel. Universal Processing Services, LLC v. Circuit Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Archer v. ChisholmDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2016
- John K. Maciver Institute for Public Policy, Inc. v. SchmitzDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.