Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Lynch

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1892No. Appeal, No. 147PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal, No. 147, July T., 1891, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Pbila. Co., Dee. T., 1887, No. 52, for legal plaintiff and refusal of judgment for use plaintiffs for want of sufficient affidavit of defence, in assumpsit on appeal bond for mesne profits in partition proceedings. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 147, July T., 1891, by plaintiffs, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Pbila. Co., Dee. T., 1887, No. 52, for legal plaintiff and refusal of judgment for use plaintiffs for want of sufficient affidavit of defence, in assumpsit on appeal bond for mesne profits in partition proceedings. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court. After the affirmance of the proceedings in partition covered by the appeal bond, the master stated an account of the mesne profits, finding Anthony Lynch indebted individual^ $546.43 to the widow, the legal plaintiff in this suit, and to the other…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb.. Justice Sterrett,

This suit against Anthony Lynch and his sureties, James McElwée and Michael McCullough, is on their obligation given on appeal to this court from the decree in Lynch v. Lynch et al., reported in 132 Pa. 422. That was a proceeding in equity for the partition of certain real estate, and an account of the rents thereof, resulting in a decree declaring, in effect, that the land in question descended to the defendants therein, as next of kin of Daniel J. Lynch, deceased, subject to the interest of his widow, the said Virginia Reed Lynch, in one half thereof, and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lynch v. LynchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Horner v. HoukSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Burglass v. BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API