Legal Opinion

Reichman v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 10, 1987No. 69801PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Reichman v. State, 497 So.2d 293 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance:

DOES A TRIAL COURT’S STATEMENT, MADE AT THE TIME OF DEPARTURE FROM THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES, THAT IT WOULD DEPART FOR ANY ONE OF THE REASONS GIVEN, REGARDLESS OF WHETHER BOTH VALID AND INVALID REASONS ARE FOUND ON REVIEW, SATISFY THE STANDARD SET FORTH IN ALBRITTON v. STATE?

Id. at 294-95. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently answered this question in the negative in Griffis v. State,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Griffis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  2. Reichman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Felts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. SiegelSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
  3. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API