Legal Opinion
Rose v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 24, 1986No. 85-1335PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
492 So.2d 1353 (1986)
Samuel Lavron ROSE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 85-1335.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 24, 1986.
Rehearing Denied September 4, 1986.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
COBB, Judge.
It is contended on this appeal that the appellant, Samuel Lavron Rose, the defendant below, convicted of robbery, is entitled to a new trial because the state exercised its peremptory challenges on the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- State v. CastilloSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kibler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Crawford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Higgs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988