South Covington & Cincinnati Street Ry. Co. v. Pelzer
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 103 — Action by Bernard Pelzer against South Covington & Cin. Street Ry. Co. to Recover Damages for Personal Injuries. APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendant Appeals. Tho plaintiff, .an infant sixteen years of age^ who sues by his father and next friend, alleges that while driving a wagon across tfoei central bridge from Newport, Kentucky, to.
Read the full summary
Case 103 — Action by Bernard Pelzer against South Covington & Cin. Street Ry. Co. to Recover Damages for Personal Injuries. APPEAL FROM CAMPBELL CIRCUIT COURT. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendant Appeals. Tho plaintiff, .an infant sixteen years of age^ who sues by his father and next friend, alleges that while driving a wagon across tfoei central bridge from Newport, Kentucky, to. Cincinnati, Ohio, his wagon was, run, into by a car of .deifenldamjt By the negligent, careless and reckless manner in which it was operated by defendant’s servant in charge thereof, by wmch plaintiff was thrown to…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the court by
JUDGE BURNAM
Affirming.
The plaintiff below and the appellee here filed his petition in the Campbell circuit court on the 10th of March, 1894, alleging that on -the 14th day of March, 1893, while driving a horse attached to a wagon over the central railway bridge, from the city of Newport to Cincinnati, a car belonging to defendant, while running over said bridge in the same direction, was operated by the employes of said company in such a negligent and reckless manner that said car ran against the wagon driven by the plaintiff, with great violence, forcing the wagon and…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Fogarty's Admr. v. Bates & Rogers Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918