Legal Opinion

Martin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wherein it seeks reargument of this Court’s decision and order (180 AD2d 596) entered on February 27, 1992, motion granted to the extent of deleting the first full paragraph (beginning at line 11) on the second page of the decision and order and substituting the following: "The IAS court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions for renewal, in view of the moving parties’ failure to assert a fact which was unknown and incapable of discovery at the time of the original motion, or to offer a valid reason for not having obtained an engineer’s opinion at that time (see, 300 W. Realty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 300 West Realty Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Martin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peerless Insurance v. CaseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Martin v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Beckford v. CanessaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. Delaj v. Bronx Park East Housing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API