Legal Opinion

Inhabitants of Hallowell v. Inhabitants of Portland

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 21, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHudson, J.

Report on agreed statement of facts.

*37This is a pauper action in which the plaintiffs seek reimbursement for money expended for relief of one Elmer Andrews and his family furnished from August 26, 1940 to December 31,1940. Because of admissions, only one question is involved, the settlement of the pauper.

He was born in Portland on November 2, 1918, the legitimate son of Vernon and Winifred Andrews. His father had no pauper settlement in the state; his mother’s was in Portland. In June, 1919, Elmer was emancipated by his father then having no settlement in the state, nor has the father since…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Rockland v. Inhabitants of LincolnvilleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
  2. City of Portland v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1902
  3. Inhabitants of Rangeley v. Inhabitants of BowdoinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1885

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Augusta v. Inhabitants of AlnaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Inhabitants of Town of Hartland v. INHABITANTS, ETC.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API