Downey v. Palmer
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Defendant moves for summary judgment on the ground that the second defense set forth in the amended answer, which al*345leges that the cause of action stated in the complaint did not accrue within three years before the commencement of this action, and that consequently said action is barred by the statute of limitations, is a complete defense to plaintiff’s alleged cause of action. Plaintiff makes a cross-motion to dismiss the said second defense on the ground that it does not constitute a legal defense to plaintiff’s claim.
The complaint is based upon the statutory…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brick v. Cohn-Hall-Marx Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Pufahl v. Estate of ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Crow v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Carr v. . ThompsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. HoffmanDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1940
- Oosterhuis v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Downey v. PalmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940