Legal Opinion

Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided April 10, 1907Published

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough, of .Manhattan, First District. Action by Julia Coogan, by Catherine Coogan, her guardian ad litem, against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered. Charles A. Gardiner (J. Osgood Nichols, of counsel), for appellant. John B. Doyle, for respondent.

1Per curiam

We can discern no material difference between the facts as presented in this record and as presented at the first trial, which, as in the present case, resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff. The first judgment was reversed by this court, with an ■ opinion reviewing the evidence at considerable length. 50 Misc. Rep. 562, 99 N. Y. Supp. 382. The same condition, especially with respect to the question whether or not a warning- was given by the guard, exists in this record as appears by the opinion to have existed before. Judgment reversed, and new .trial ordered, with costs to the appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coogan v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API