Ansley v. Hart
Supreme Court of Georgia
Deeds. Evidence. Levy and Sale. Before Judge Fort. Schley Superior Court. September Term, 1885. To the report contained in the decision, it is necessary to add only that the marshal’s deed oh which the claimant relied was signed, a James Longstreet, United States Marshal, Southern Dist. of Ga., by A. R. Wright, deputy.”
Read the full summary
Deeds. Evidence. Levy and Sale. Before Judge Fort. Schley Superior Court. September Term, 1885. To the report contained in the decision, it is necessary to add only that the marshal’s deed oh which the claimant relied was signed, a James Longstreet, United States Marshal, Southern Dist. of Ga., by A. R. Wright, deputy.” This was objected to on the ground that the deputy had -no authority to execute the deed, but it should have been executed by the marshal himself, and that no authority to make or sign such deed by the deputy accompanied it. The objection was overruled, and error was assigned…
1Opinion of the Court
Blandford, Justice.
This was a claim case, and the facts submitted show that one Armstrong obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of the United States against I. N. Hart & Co.; that D. F. Hart was one of the company. The property here claimed was levied on and sold under an execution which issued on said judgment. It was sold and purchased by one Wilson. The execution not being fully paid off, Wilson purchased it and had the same transferred to himself, he sold, and conveyed the land to Shepherd and Parker; they conveyed the land to D. F. Hart. Mrs. M. E. Hart pur *44chased the ji. fa,, from…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903