Legal Opinion

Sweatman v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORP., ETC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 27, 1982No. 81-296PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants William and Beatrice Sweatman instituted this cause in response to a non-judicial foreclosure action against their home by Southern National Bank. The Sweatmans' prayer for relief sought: 1) to have the mortgage held by Bank against their homeplace declared void, alleging that the signature of one co-signer was a forgery; and 2) a quieting of title to the property in themselves.

Subsequently, Bank was placed into receivership, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) substituted as a party defendant. FDIC impleaded Robert C. McKee, alleging that if the mortgage to Bank…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cougar Min. Co. v. MINERAL LAND & MIN. CONSULT. INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Raidt v. CraneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  3. Adams Supply Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. McLemore v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Chambers v. CulverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Gulf Shores v. HARBERT INTERN.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. Marine Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. J.A.P. v. M.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
  4. Handley v. HandleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API