Legal Opinion

McQueen v. Tenison

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 12, 1915No. 7393PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRainex, C. J.

The appellee Tenison took a mortgage on one “Maxwell” four-passenger automobile, factory No. 32466, to secure a promissory note for the sum of $586.60, executed by the Dallas Automobile Clearing House Association, a corporation. Default having been made in the payment of said note, Tenison sued the Dallas Automobile Clearing-House Association, H. W. Sanders, and W. L. McQueen, to recover on said note and to foreclose said mortgage, and sued out a writ of sequestration, which was levied on a machine described as “a five-passenger Maxwell automobile, model 1-3, car No. 2466,” which was…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shephard v. Van DorenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
  2. First Nat. Bk. of Brookfield v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. C.I.T. Corporation v. NaudackArizona Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API