Rucker v. Goldstein
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The single issue presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, after a jury verdict for the plaintiff in a dogbite case.
On January 18, 1980, appellant Neva Rucker was attacked and injured by a dog while picking up the afternoon paper from her yard. According to appellant, the attack lasted for approximately five minutes, during which time the dog pulled off her shoe and bit her foot. When appellant got free from the dog, she crawled into the house and called a doctor.
Mrs. Rucker contends that at the time…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Durden v. BarnettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
- Owen v. HampsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Allen by and Through Allen v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- King v. BreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- DAVIS BY AND THROUGH FREEMAN v. UlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Humphries v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Herring v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Williams v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.