Legal Opinion
Remcor Products Co. v. Scotsman Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 9, 1994No. 93 C 1822PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Remcor Products Co. sued defendants Scotsman Group, Inc. and Booth, Inc. for infringing United States Patents No. 4,300,359 (the ’359 patent) and Re. 34,465 (the ’465 patent). Each is entitled “Cold Plate System for Ice Dispenser”. We refer to both collectively as the ’359 patents. Presently before the court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants’ sole contention in support of the motion is that the ’359 patents are invalid as obvious.
While the ultimate question of patent validity is one of law, the conclusion that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Northern Telecom, Inc. v. Datapoint Corporation, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Remcor Products Co. v. Scotsman Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994