Legal Opinion

In re Levin, Kronenberg & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 12, 1915No. 92PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Petition to Revise and Appeal from Order of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Circuit Judge.

June 2, 1913, Revin, Kronenberg & Co., a corporation, carrying on the business of lumber and wood working in Brooklyn, entered into a written contract with the Automatic Sprinkler Company of America whereby the latter agreed to install in its premises an automatic sprinkler system as a protection against fire. The system included pipes, fittings, valves, sprinkler heads, a fire pump, and an air compressor, all of which could be removed without substantial injury to themselves or to the premises. The contract was one of conditional sale, providing that the title to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. William W. Bierce, Ltd. v. HutchinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Central Union Gas Co. v. . BrowningNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Kirk v. CrystalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Equitable Trust Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  2. Viking Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. ThwaitsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API