Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1909No. 50PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Equity. Suit by John M. Conroy against the Penn Electrical & Manufacturing Company for infringement of patent. On demurrer to bill.

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, District Judge.

This is a suit for the infringement of a reissued patent, the subject of which is, “Improvements for Ornamenting Glass.” The bill is in .the usual form and prays for the customary relief. The case comes before the court upon demurrer, which (among other matters) attacks the validity of the reissue. The demurrer must be overruled.

Ordinarily no expression of opinion is advisable in explanation or support of such ruling. In this case, however, the counsel in their *300' arguments have intimated a desire that the court should decide whether or not the patent in suit has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co. v. ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1908
  5. Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co. v. ConroyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  2. Conroy v. Penn Electrical & Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API