Harding v. Harding
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from interlocutory order of injunction. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Murray F. Tuley, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams
The interlocutory or preliminary injunction having been granted solely on the verified bill, the foregoing statement of the contents of the bill is necessary to an understanding of the case. The contention of appellants’ counsel is, that the bill is merely a creditor’s bill and must be regarded as exclusively such, and that, considered as a creditor’s bill, it is bad in not showing that the complainant has exhausted her legal remedies. While many and perhaps most of the averments of the bill are such as would be appropriate in a creditor’s bill, yet they tend to show the impracticability, if…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Blake v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Hare v. StegallIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Becker v. BeckerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1884
- Springfield Marine & Fire Insurance v. PeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- McRae v. McRaeSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
- Harding v. Standard Oil Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Kohler v. KohlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1945
- Stewart v. StewartAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Jensen v. JensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.