Legal Opinion
Carniol v. New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 26, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kathryn E. Freed, J.
In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner, Robert Carniol (Carniol) moves, via order to show cause, for: (1) a declaration that the use of Global Positioning System (GPS)1 technology to track taxi drivers is a search under New York law; (2) a declaration that a search using this GPS system violates article I, § 12 *201of the New York Constitution;2 (3) an order barring the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC) from using the fruits of GPS searches to prosecute individual taxi drivers; (4) an order that respondents, TLC, David Yassky (Yassky…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Minnesota v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hudson Shore v. State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2025
- El-Nahal v. YasskyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Etere v. Nassau CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021