Legal Opinion

American Stoker Co. v. Underfeed Stoker Co. of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 12, 1911No. 1,474PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Suit in equity by the American Stoker Company against the Underfeed Stoker Company of America and David Hunter, Jr. Decree (182 Fed. 642) for defendants, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

LANNING, Circuit Judge.

The complainant, American Stolcer Company, owner of the James Garden patent, No. 648,251, for improvements in furnaces, charges the defendants with infringement of the patent. The defenses are the usual ones of invalidity of the patent and noninfringement. In its opinion the Circuit Court held the patent valid but not infringed. 182 Fed. 642. The decree, however, simply dismissed the bill without stating thé reason therefor. It is not difficult to point out substantial differences between the furnace described in the Garden patent and the furnace made by the defendants.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Stoker Co. v. Underfeed Stoker Co. of AmericaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1910

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dowse v. Federal Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1918
  2. LeFiell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. RileyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913
  4. Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. RileyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1914
  5. Underfeed Stoker Co. of America v. Westinghouse Mach. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API