Legal Opinion

Schutzer v. City of Miami

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1958No. 57-343PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

The appeal in this cause is from a “final judgment” dated February 4, 1957, the material portion of which is as follows:

“Ordered and adjudged that the Defendant’s Motion for Directed Verdict be hereby granted.”

Although the appellee has not raised the question, the court sua sponte has determined that the “final judgment” sought to be reviewed is not a final decision from which appeal would lie under the provisions of Rule 3.2(b), Florida Appellate Rules. Until a final judgment is rendered that is subject to appeal pursuant to the aforementioned rule, there is nothing for this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brannon v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bumby & Stimpson, Inc. v. Peninsula Utilities Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
  2. Ballard v. HopkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962
  3. Adderley v. TightDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Dewey v. MymattDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  5. Pakonis v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API