Legal Opinion

Marzolf v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 4, 1960No. 64141; protests 291273 K, etc. (Seattle)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

Plaintiff has moved to amend his protest in the 11 suits, enumerated on the annexed schedule A, by adding to each such protest the following claim:

We claim that prepared or preserved pork assessed at 3per pound under Par. 703 of the Tariff Act of 1930 is properly dutiable at 2(i per pound under said Par. 703 as modified by T.D. 61802.

Defendant opposes these motions to amend and prays the court to deny the motions.

The original protest filed in suit 291273-K appears to be typical of the several protests. It reads as follows:

The Collector of Customs, Port of Seattle, Washington

Prote…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Commerce Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API